Skip to main content

Good Effort

A few years ago, I read a book by Irene Hannon.  I enjoyed it.  She's written many books and I haven't read one in a while, but I decided to read the new one that has come out this spring.  It is titled One Perfect Spring.

The story begins with Haley Summers.  She's 11 years old and is living with her mom in a home that needs a lot of repair work.  Next door to them lives Maureen Chandler, a 60 year old professor at a local Christian college.  Haley writes a letter to a businessman asking for help to find Ms. Chandler's son that she gave up for adoption when he was born.  The man responds.  Enter Keith, the business man's executive assistant, who is asked to follow up on the request and pursue the matter.  Keith connects with Haley's mother, Claire, and sparks fly.  The back of the book says all of this, so I'm not giving anything away.  Much of the rest of the book is very predictable.  There are a few minor unexpected twists, but nothing major.

The writing is competent, except for a few big jumps that I saw.  I remember being surprised by a scene in which Claire's father arrives at her home.  Keith is there and then "poof!"--suddenly he isn't!  The transition was missing.

I often wonder, too, why so much physical description of how the male and female characters look needs to be given.  It isn't simply thin, slender, or handsome...  sentences like "He had a feeling she had great legs." on pg. 39;  "As for those soft curves..." (Keith thinks of Claire on pg. 56); and "tried not to stare at the well-developed hamstrings below his gym shorts" on pg. 157.    I had a single friend once ask me about writing like this.  I explained that I could see how it wasn't wise for single women to read books like this because of where it leads their minds.  But, I felt it wasn't always wise for married women either.  One of the reasons we love to watch movies and read stories is that as readers, we can live vicariously through the characters.  When I read lines like the ones above, I wonder...  Do these lines need to be in Christian romance books?  Or could you not include them?  I remember a book several years ago, The Familiar Stranger, which made me think it could be done.  The attraction between a man and woman could be described without sounding like a Harlequin romance--because in that book Christina Berry did it well, in my opinion.

The story moves along at a good pace.  I didn't find myself skipping bunches of pages (which is a good sign in my mind) that the book all ties together.

Lately, a lot of Christian fiction seems to be blending together for me.  This one is a lot like Caught in the Middle.  If you like Hannon's writing in other books and like sappy, Harlequin-type Christian romance, then you'll like this one.  If you don't and prefer something more like The Sweetest Thing by Elizabeth Musser or Ann Gabhart's books, then I'd pass on this one.

Please note that I received a complimentary copy of this book for review from Revell Books.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison of Verses

Tonight I was reading the Mom's Bible again (NCV) and compared this verse: NCV Ephesians 5:22-24 22 Wives, yield to your husbands, as you do to the Lord, 23 because the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the church. And he is the Savior of the body, which is the church. 24 As the church yields to Christ, so you wives should yield to your husbands in everything. NIV Ephesians 5:22-24 22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. The Message 22-24 Wives, understand and support your husbands in ways that show your support for Christ. The husband provides leadership to his wife the way Christ does to his church, not by domineering but by cherishing. So just as the church submits to Christ as he exercises such leadership, wives should likewis...

Grieved

Why is it that my generation (I belong to Gen X) and generations after us always seem to think that they know more than the generations that have come before us? Why is there such a lack of respect in our generation for our elders? Why do we think that the liturgy of the church and hymns are irrelevant? It is ironic to me that the emergent movement is saying that the seeker sensitive movement is irrelevant. It seems as if it was only a few years ago when it was the seeker sensitive movement that said to the traditional church that it (the traditional church) was irrelevant. I'm reading a book with all of these big words and I want to be honest--I didn't understand a lot of it. I'm not dumb. I understood most of it, but the author was assuming a lot of background knowledge on the part of the reader. Most of the time I learn deep theological concepts and then I have to store them in my "attic" (as Autumn would say) because there isn't enough room in the ...

ESV, NIV, or NASB and then there's the ICB, ESV or NIrV...which should we read?

I am so thankful for my friend's question about the ESV vs. NASB and NIV. I couldn't remember the difference so I went to look it up. I knew that John Piper and Tim Keller, both pastors and authors that I deeply respect have switched over to the ESV. All of the churches that we have attended over the past few years PCA or Reformed Baptist have also switched to the ESV. I did find a blog that explained the differences and that helped me ( http://thefoolishgalatian.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/niv-vs-esv-and-why-piper-switched/ ) I knew why I didn't like the KJV--it was written in the days when writers were paid by a patron and that often slanted the translation. The NKJV, from what I understand, is a revision of the KJV that uses more modern language. Most churches I have attended used the NIV until the ESV came out. The blog I found explained that the ESV is a more literal translation---like the NASB. The NASB is a very literal translation. The ESV has come to be consid...